Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth baptist church
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. per A7 - No assertion of notability JForget 14:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Truth baptist church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable org. WP:ORG. No independent sources and I could not find significant coverage. No notablity asserted in the article. Creator deleted Prod, notability, and primarysources tags without making any changes. There is an WP:COI issue as it looks like the pastor created this article. Clubmarx (talk) 21:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree, non notable fails WP:ORG unable to find anything of note. Paste Let’s have a chat. 21:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. I could not find any reliable sources to indicate notability. JUJUTACULAR 21:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as A7- no assertion of importance or significance. Quantpole (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it is very unlikely that an organization less than two months old would have acquired enough comment from independent sources to be notable, and this one hasn't. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (not speedy though), and the only Ghits I found were telephone listings and the church's own website. I, too, suspect the pastor created the article. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 22:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability, plus the obvious COI. Nyttend (talk) 03:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.